Dissertation:
Papers:
- Sloggett & Dillon. (in revision). We can stop this, you and I: Person blocking in English reflexive comprehension. Cognitive Science.
- Grant, Sloggett, & Dillon. (submitted). Processing ambiguities in attachment and pronominal reference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
- Sloggett, Andrews, & Dillon, (to appear). Agreement is all like: every illusion is illusory in its own way. In Ivan (Ed.), A festschrift for Peggy Speas.
- Dillon, Clifon, Sloggett, & Frazier. (2017). Appositives are set aside in working memory: Evidence from eye-tracking while reading. Journal of Memory and Language.
- Lago, Sloggett, Schlueter, Chow, Williams, Lau, & Phillips. (2016). Coreference and antecedent representation across languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
- Dillon, Mishler, Sloggett, & Phillips. (2013). Contrasting interference profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Journal of Memory and Language.
Presentations:
- Sloggett & Dillon. (2018). Person blocking in reflexive processing: When “I” matter more than “them”. Talk at CUNY 31: Davis, California.
- Sloggett & Dillon. (2017). Animacy in reflexive processing: When “it” matters more than verbs. Talk at CUNY 30: Boston, Massachusetts.
- Sloggett & Dillon. (2016). When errors aren’t: How comprehenders selectively violate Binding Theory. Talk at NELS 47: Amherst, Massachusetts.
- Sloggett & Dillon. (2016). When do comprehenders violate Binding Theory? Depends on your point of view. Talk at AMLaP 22: Bilbo, Spain.
- Andrews, Yacovone, Sloggett, & Dillon. (2016). Reflexives: We don’t see the attraction. Poster at AMLaP 22: Bilbao, Spain.
- Sloggett. (2016). Do comprehenders violate Binding Theory? Depends on your point of view. Distinguished Alumnus Address, Linguistics Undergraduate Research Conference, University of California, Santa Cruz.
- Sloggett & Dillon. (2016). Person blocking effects in the processing of English reflexives. Poster at CUNY 29: Gainesville, Florida.
- Sloggett & Dillon. (2015). Reflexive interference is the result of a logophoric interpretation. Poster at CUNY 28: Los Angeles, California.
- Grant, Dillon, & Sloggett. (2015). Similarities in processing attachment and pronominal ambiguities. Poster at CUNY 28: Los Angeles, California.
- Dillon, Clifton, Sloggett, & Frazier. (2015). Not all relative clauses interfere equally in filler-gap processing. Poster at CUNY 28: Los Angeles, California.
- Grant, Dillon, & Sloggett. (2014). Ambiguity advantages in attachment and pronominal reference: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Talk at AMLaP 20: Edinburgh, UK.
- Lago, Sloggett, Schlueter, Chow, Lau, & Phillips. (2014). Does pronoun processing vary across languages? Poster at AMLaP 20: Edinburgh, UK.
- Sloggett. (2013). Case Licensing in Processing: Evidence from German. Poster at CUNY 26: Columbia, South Carolina.
- Lago, Sloggett, Chow, & Phillips. (2013). What types of lexical information are reaccessed during pronoun processing? Poster at CUNY 26: Columbia, South Carolina.
- Dillon, Mishler, Sloggett, & Phillips. (2011). Contrasting interference profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence. Poster at the CUNY 24: Stanford, California.