A Critic’s Role in the Golden Age

“TV is a problem only if you’ve forgotten how to look and listen,” claims a university professor in Don DeLillo’s novel White Noise. He complains that his students are no longer open to the medium; they find television “worse than junk mail… They’re ashamed of their television past. They want to talk about movies.” White Noise was published in 1985, when television programs were regularly criticized for being formulaic, lacking real substance and focusing more on commercial success than artistic profit. In fact, television’s reputation as an artistic medium was so bad that, in 1996, the premium network HBO began running ads with their new slogan: “It’s not TV. it’s HBO.

But now, the tables have turned. Personally, I have heard countless college students share viewpoints in perfect contradiction to the students in DeLillo’s book; they believe that film is dead, that television has been reborn. Avid fans of Game of Thrones and Mad Men will tell you; while Hollywood got hooked on commercially successful gimmicks like 3D superhero movies, television emerged as the premier platform for long-form storytelling. The “auteur” has been replaced by the “showrunner,” and art house cinemas are losing business to Netflix-streaming laptop computers.

HBO has long been fighting at the front lines of this television revolution. Oz, which debuted in 1997, was the network’s first long-form dramatic series, a dark story about life in prison that could be considered a forerunner in the push for weightier television content. Though Oz achieved little commercial success upon release, it paved the way for widely-acclaimed series like The Sopranos and The Wire. Then, unsurprisingly, the success of these high-quality dramas inspired imitations. The revolution that began on HBO spread across the television channels like static electricity. We saw Lost on ABC, then Friday Night Lights on NBC, followed by Mad Men and Breaking Bad on AMC. Fans and critics alike flocked proudly to their tubes; it was a new century, and the new content was no longer “worse than junk mail.” It was art.

But are we truly living in a “Golden Age” of television? Or is it a gilded age?

Though television may be better than it has ever been, I am too often disappointed by new series that turn out to be as formulaic as they are trendy. It is as if these shows are bouyed by the success of recent gems but still held to the low standards of classic television. This could be said of HBO’s most recent release, Westworld, a big-budget series that the network is banking on being the #NextBigThing. Though HBO’s Game of Thrones has maintained its army of followers, many of the network’s recent debuts—Vinyl, True Detective—have swallowed millions of dollars only to be cancelled in the prime time of their youth. For this reason, argues critic Emily Nussbaum in her New Yorker review of the series, Westworld “can’t just be good—it needs to be a hit, too.”

 

westworldpromo

 

Unfortunately, Westworld, like those other eventual flops, blew its budget on flash to blind audiences to the sloppiness of its narrative. Critics should be the ones to remind us how to “look and listen” like DeLillo’s professor, to watch television with a critical eye. But for an array of reasons, critics like Nussbaum and the AV Club’s Zack Handlen are largely complacent in the inflation of the medium’s reputation. Though Nussbaum’s review of Westworld raises important questions about the show, it is ultimately as toothless as Handlen’s in its judgment.

Based on the Michael Crichton film from 1973, Westworld is an intriguing offering; the show follows an ensemble of characters involved in a fictional Western-themed amusement park where the wealthy guests can have their way—sexually and violently—with the artificially intelligent “hosts” that populate the expansive artificial frontier. The series is ambitious; it tackles the darker sides of entertainment and human nature, placing the AI robots in center frame and featuring most of the human characters as creepy executives or their bloodthirsty clientele. As the robots slowly gain awareness of their sad situation, they increasingly inspire our empathy; the poor things get shot, stabbed and raped until night falls and their memories are wiped for another day of human amusement.

“The show introduces itself as a science-fiction thriller about cyborgs who become self-aware,” writes Nussbaum, but “then reveals its true identity as what happens when an HBO drama struggles to do the same.” She argues that the series is an attempt at criticizing our sadistic enjoyment of sex and violence in the media, “an exploitation series about exploitation.” The show actually works though, argues Nussbaum, because of its “elegance” and the way it “gets under your skin.” She is not wrong; like its opening credits sequence—needled artificial ligaments and a shiny player piano—the show is often as unnerving as it is stylish.

 

westworld-1_-_h_2016

 

Similarly, Handlen believes that the first episode of Westworld succeeds because it “never lets the horrors it depicts completely undercut a certain sense of wonder.” He discovers this sense of wonder in the hopeful robotic hosts, and also in himself as he puzzles over the mysteries of the amusement park. However, there is an important distinction to be made between elegance and wonder—while the former is a question of aesthetics, the latter is largely a function of plot. And the plot of Westworld creates a sense of wonder more through formulaic twists than through the emotive eyes of Dolores (the park’s “farmer’s daughter” attraction and the series’ main star).

Specifically, In order to build the foundations of a narrative that could last longer than the first episode’s ninety minutes, Westworld introduces layers of enigma that are clearly intended to reel audiences in without demonstrating any relevance to the rest of the story. For example, there is Ed Harris’ character, “The Man in Black,” who is searching for some kind of hidden objective within Westworld. Apparently, the only way to find this meta-game is to torture the robotic citizens until they divulge any relevant information—The Man in Black scalps a poor cowboy to find a maze hidden under his plastic forehead. Why should we, as an audience, care about this puzzling meta-game? It is not related to anything else that happens in the episode; the subplot only exists to develop a pervasive sense of conspiracy, as if beneath the main narrative there is something “bigger” going on. This tactic has been popular mostly in sci-fi and fantasy programs since Lost employed it to keep viewers intrigued for 121 cliffhanging episodes. The series constructed endless layers of mysteries while promising to reveal every secret, to eventually tie up each of its loose-ends. Spoiler alert: at Lost‘s finale, most of the series puzzles went entirely unsolved. If the generally held consensus is that a show is successful as long as it keeps audiences watching; I would argue that television succeeds only when a series keeps its promise to tell a complete and satisfying story. Lost‘s failure in this respect is enough to make me “wonder” about where Westworld is headed.

 

ed-harris-as-man-in-black-credit-john-p-johnson-hbo

 

Though Handlen agrees that The Man in Black is “an element that doesn’t quite work,” the lack of real plot development only makes him nervous for the episodes to come. He perceives the pilot as a success even though it functions only as extended exposition, more like the first part of a riddle than the first chapter of a full story. I find this logic confusing, as you would never endorse a riddle without knowing its solution—one half is meaningless without the other. Although she is more hesitant to demonstrate outright support of the series, Nussbaum similarly advises that we keep watching.

Primarily, Nussbaum criticizes the show for making use of the same exploitation that it claims to denounce—patriarchal violence against women in entertainment tailored to straight men. This is a valid concern; social satire can be even more problematic than its targets when it takes societal flaws to extremes without delivering the message that they are, in fact, flaws. Nussbaum worries that Westworld rides dangerously close to this type of ambiguity. She asks, “Is Westworld the blinkered macho fantasy, or is that ‘Westworld’?” This is the kind of scalpel-sharp critique that is too often lacking in television criticism; looking past the face value of a show to dissect it under the light of a larger political framework.

But the way that Nussbaum follows her query reveals why serious critique of the medium can be so challenging: “It’s a meta-cliffhanger with its own allure,” she writes, “leaving us only one way to find out: stay tuned for next week’s episode.” Handlen makes a similar statement in his review, sharing that he is uncertain whether or not the story will be sustainable, but is “eager to find out.”

 

westworldlukehemsworth-large_transy81phnlw26k7kws-prb1cmepeuo_wdycc5nwa1yrmnu

 

This is the paradox of television critique; a critic’s job is to swallow works of art whole, to digest them completely in oder to judge them fairly, but television is rarely complete. When a show has a strong following and commercial success, it can afford to close its narrative arcs and tell a whole story. But many series, like Lost, and probably Westworld, intentionally leave plot-lines soaring and mysteries unsolved so as to keep audiences hooked. How is a critic to judge a work that might be nothing but bait, that will only take off its mask after years of seasons have come and gone? Nussbaum and Handlen are somewhat critical of Westworld, but they hold their tongues in light of the fact that the series is only getting started, that their worries could be assuaged by future episodes. However, this position is insufficient, because future episodes will only exist if the audience responds positively to early episodes. In this way, television critics have their hands tied; they cannot fairly judge a show until it is finished, but still must play a role in whether or not that completion ever occurs. Netflix’s all-in-one season release model would help critics navigate this issue, but HBO has maintained its commitment to the classic episode-per-week trickle.

Moreover, the problem is only complicated by the fact that directors and writers are often shuffled between episodes and seasons—Westworld, for example, has had a unique creative team for each installment. Where does a singular work of television end and the next one begin? Handlen has written reviews of each Westworld episode one by one, becoming increasingly critical as HBO reveals more of its hand. “Spending hours showing us a curtain might hold our attention,” he writes in his review of episode five, “but sooner or later, you have to pull the curtain back.” Of course, penning piecemeal reviews like this limits a critic’s ability to judge the whole picture at once. On the other hand, Nussbaum’s review covers the first four episodes, an arbitrary number that is still too few to judge Westworld’s complete narrative, yet simultaneously too many to treat the episodes like individual works.

 

hbos-westworld-season-1-the-maze-1-670x376

 

It is tempting to submit the movie Ex Machina as the converse of Westworld (the film about artificial intelligence is subtle where Westworld is exploitative and narratively-taut where the show is tangled). It is equally tempting to entirely dismiss the show because of the painful performances from two of its actors, Simon Quarterman and Sidse Babett Knudsen, who play important Westworld executives (while he overacts enough to make Anthony Hopkins seem like a robot, she comes off colder than the robots due to her monotonic attempt at an American accent). But to make such warranted criticisms would be unfair to an artwork that is still unfinished. There is only one way to find out the truth about Westworld, and that is to pay for an expensive premium network subscription and watch one episode each week until most fans lose interest and the series is canceled. Only then will it be finished and we can criticize fairly in retrospect. But do not be discouraged! We are lucky to be living in the Golden Age of television.

Stay tuned.

9,682 Comments

  • khan commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    That’s the reason it is advisable that you need to right inspection earlier than writing. You can set up a lot better present with this. acim

  • live slot resmi slot138 commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    It is quite very helpful, in contrast it will be vital so that you can have a look at applying website page: live slot resmi slot138

  • hum commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Admiring the time and effort you put into your blog and detailed information you offer!.. kids smart watch

  • HARIS Aman commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    I am glad you take pride in what you write. This makes you stand way out from many other writers that push poorly written content. acim

  • Sp5der Hoodies commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Sp5der Hoodies
    are perfect for daily life, outdoor activities, fitness enthusiasts, and gaming sessions. They’re great for running errands, hiking, camping, working out, or just lounging around.

  • SEO commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    We have not too long ago started out any website, the knowledge an individual offer on this web site provides aided myself tremendously. Thank you regarding your entire moment & perform. 聲樂課程

  • 오피스타 commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    당신이 작성하는 것을 멋지게, 정보는 매우 좋고 흥미 롭습니다. 나는 당신에게 내 사이트에 대한 링크를 줄 것입니다. 오피스타

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    I am very glad to know that your site is upgrading from the with simplest to more faster and synchronized form. I am quite familiar of a lot of sites since I work as a freelance writer and one of the sites that I find evolve is your site respectively. 外籍 老師 英文

  • 오피스타 commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    이 정보 메시지를 공유 할 수있는 훌륭한 기능입니다. 이 블로그에 대한 지식에 깊은 인상을 받았습니다. 여러면에서 도움이됩니다. 다시 게시 해 주셔서 감사합니다. 오피스타

  • Executive Limo service near me commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Discover top-tier executive limo service near you. Our fleet of luxurious limousines, driven by professional chauffeurs, guarantees a seamless and sophisticated travel experience. Perfect for business meetings, airport transfers, and special events, enjoy unparalleled comfort and reliability. Book now for the finest executive limo service tailored to your needs.

    https://avantlimo.com/executive-limo-service-san-diego-ca/

  • auhikari-biglobe.com commented on June 24, 2024 Reply
  • bb commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    I think I have never seen such blogs ever before that has complete things with all details which I want. So kindly update this ever for us. 먹튀검증

  • toto macau commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Situs Bandar Toto Macau alexistogel resmi adalah tempat terbaik untuk bermain togel online. Jika Anda senang bermain togel, situs ini sangat direkomendasikan untuk Anda.

  • estilod.com commented on June 24, 2024 Reply
  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    […]please visit the sites we follow, including this one, as it represents our picks from the web[…]… 外籍 老師 英文

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Wow! This could be one particular of the most useful blogs We have ever arrive across on this subject. Basically Great. I’m also an expert in this topic so I can understand your effort. 外籍 老師 英文

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    You could definitely see your enthusiasm within the work you write. The sector hopes for more passionate writers such as you who aren’t afraid to mention how they believe. All the time go after your heart. 外籍 老師 英文

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    We still cannot quite believe that I was able to often be any type of those staring at the important points located on your blog post. My loved ones and i are sincerely thankful for your special generosity too as for giving me possibility pursue our chosen profession path. Basically information I acquired within your web-site. 外籍 老師 英文

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Super-Duper blog! I am loving it!! Will be back later to read some more. I am taking your feeds also 外籍 老師 英文

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Lovely just what I was searching for. Thanks to the author for taking his clock time on this one. 外籍老師

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your site. You have some really good posts and I believe I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested. Regards! 英語口語練習

  • UPSers commented on June 24, 2024 Reply

    Possessing read this I thought it had been quite beneficial. I value you taking time and work to put this article together. I when once again locate myself paying method to significantly time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was nonetheless worth it! 英語口語練習

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    we also want to be perceived as hospitable people. 918kissauto

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Thank you for clearing up my confusion, สล็อตออนไลน์

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    This pies of an article is enlightening JILI WALLET

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    If you need to know JOKER AUTO WALLET

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Click this JOKER WALLET

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Everyone may use this website with ease Live22 auto

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    challenges that might arise with Canon printers. MEGA888 AUTO

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    It’s great to find someone with genuine opinions about this issue. PG SLOT AUTO

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    I must say that it’s fantastic and user-friendly. PG SLOT AUTO WALLET

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    The game has beautiful graphics, pussyslot

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    challenges that might arise with Canon printers. เว็บสล็อต 168 ฝาก ถอน true wallet

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Thanks for sharing great informative content. เว็บสล็อตวอเลท

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    while protecting slotxo wallet

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply
  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    In a world where our privacy is increasingly สล็อตเว็บตรง

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Thank you for a wonderful share. PUSSY888 เว็บตรง

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Breaking news from around the world! 918KISS AUTO

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply
  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Dan pada zaman sekarang ini kita harus benar-benar pandai dalam memilih ສລ໊ອດອອນລາຍ

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Thank you for sharing. Betflix wallet

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    but in the hands of a professional marketer, สล็อตฝากถอนวอเล็ท

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    screenings, JOKER SLOT

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    but only if you give all the necessary information the first time. เว็บสล็อต xo ออ โต้

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply
  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Take proactive steps towards a healthier life สล็อตออนไลน์

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    conflicts continue to unfold. เว็บสล็อตออโต้

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    How can nations navigate this changing geopolitical เว็บหวยออนไลน์ จ่ายจริง

  • nagavip168 commented on June 25, 2024 Reply

    Memberikan inspirasi terbaru dan memberikan suatu kebahagiaan yang JILI WALLET

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *