“TV is a problem only if you’ve forgotten how to look and listen,” claims a university professor in Don DeLillo’s novel White Noise. He complains that his students are no longer open to the medium; they find television “worse than junk mail… They’re ashamed of their television past. They want to talk about movies.” White Noise was published in 1985, when television programs were regularly criticized for being formulaic, lacking real substance and focusing more on commercial success than artistic profit. In fact, television’s reputation as an artistic medium was so bad that, in 1996, the premium network HBO began running ads with their new slogan: “It’s not TV. it’s HBO.”
But now, the tables have turned. Personally, I have heard countless college students share viewpoints in perfect contradiction to the students in DeLillo’s book; they believe that film is dead, that television has been reborn. Avid fans of Game of Thrones and Mad Men will tell you; while Hollywood got hooked on commercially successful gimmicks like 3D superhero movies, television emerged as the premier platform for long-form storytelling. The “auteur” has been replaced by the “showrunner,” and art house cinemas are losing business to Netflix-streaming laptop computers.
HBO has long been fighting at the front lines of this television revolution. Oz, which debuted in 1997, was the network’s first long-form dramatic series, a dark story about life in prison that could be considered a forerunner in the push for weightier television content. Though Oz achieved little commercial success upon release, it paved the way for widely-acclaimed series like The Sopranos and The Wire. Then, unsurprisingly, the success of these high-quality dramas inspired imitations. The revolution that began on HBO spread across the television channels like static electricity. We saw Lost on ABC, then Friday Night Lights on NBC, followed by Mad Men and Breaking Bad on AMC. Fans and critics alike flocked proudly to their tubes; it was a new century, and the new content was no longer “worse than junk mail.” It was art.
But are we truly living in a “Golden Age” of television? Or is it a gilded age?
Though television may be better than it has ever been, I am too often disappointed by new series that turn out to be as formulaic as they are trendy. It is as if these shows are bouyed by the success of recent gems but still held to the low standards of classic television. This could be said of HBO’s most recent release, Westworld, a big-budget series that the network is banking on being the #NextBigThing. Though HBO’s Game of Thrones has maintained its army of followers, many of the network’s recent debuts—Vinyl, True Detective—have swallowed millions of dollars only to be cancelled in the prime time of their youth. For this reason, argues critic Emily Nussbaum in her New Yorker review of the series, Westworld “can’t just be good—it needs to be a hit, too.”
Unfortunately, Westworld, like those other eventual flops, blew its budget on flash to blind audiences to the sloppiness of its narrative. Critics should be the ones to remind us how to “look and listen” like DeLillo’s professor, to watch television with a critical eye. But for an array of reasons, critics like Nussbaum and the AV Club’s Zack Handlen are largely complacent in the inflation of the medium’s reputation. Though Nussbaum’s review of Westworld raises important questions about the show, it is ultimately as toothless as Handlen’s in its judgment.
Based on the Michael Crichton film from 1973, Westworld is an intriguing offering; the show follows an ensemble of characters involved in a fictional Western-themed amusement park where the wealthy guests can have their way—sexually and violently—with the artificially intelligent “hosts” that populate the expansive artificial frontier. The series is ambitious; it tackles the darker sides of entertainment and human nature, placing the AI robots in center frame and featuring most of the human characters as creepy executives or their bloodthirsty clientele. As the robots slowly gain awareness of their sad situation, they increasingly inspire our empathy; the poor things get shot, stabbed and raped until night falls and their memories are wiped for another day of human amusement.
“The show introduces itself as a science-fiction thriller about cyborgs who become self-aware,” writes Nussbaum, but “then reveals its true identity as what happens when an HBO drama struggles to do the same.” She argues that the series is an attempt at criticizing our sadistic enjoyment of sex and violence in the media, “an exploitation series about exploitation.” The show actually works though, argues Nussbaum, because of its “elegance” and the way it “gets under your skin.” She is not wrong; like its opening credits sequence—needled artificial ligaments and a shiny player piano—the show is often as unnerving as it is stylish.
Similarly, Handlen believes that the first episode of Westworld succeeds because it “never lets the horrors it depicts completely undercut a certain sense of wonder.” He discovers this sense of wonder in the hopeful robotic hosts, and also in himself as he puzzles over the mysteries of the amusement park. However, there is an important distinction to be made between elegance and wonder—while the former is a question of aesthetics, the latter is largely a function of plot. And the plot of Westworld creates a sense of wonder more through formulaic twists than through the emotive eyes of Dolores (the park’s “farmer’s daughter” attraction and the series’ main star).
Specifically, In order to build the foundations of a narrative that could last longer than the first episode’s ninety minutes, Westworld introduces layers of enigma that are clearly intended to reel audiences in without demonstrating any relevance to the rest of the story. For example, there is Ed Harris’ character, “The Man in Black,” who is searching for some kind of hidden objective within Westworld. Apparently, the only way to find this meta-game is to torture the robotic citizens until they divulge any relevant information—The Man in Black scalps a poor cowboy to find a maze hidden under his plastic forehead. Why should we, as an audience, care about this puzzling meta-game? It is not related to anything else that happens in the episode; the subplot only exists to develop a pervasive sense of conspiracy, as if beneath the main narrative there is something “bigger” going on. This tactic has been popular mostly in sci-fi and fantasy programs since Lost employed it to keep viewers intrigued for 121 cliffhanging episodes. The series constructed endless layers of mysteries while promising to reveal every secret, to eventually tie up each of its loose-ends. Spoiler alert: at Lost‘s finale, most of the series puzzles went entirely unsolved. If the generally held consensus is that a show is successful as long as it keeps audiences watching; I would argue that television succeeds only when a series keeps its promise to tell a complete and satisfying story. Lost‘s failure in this respect is enough to make me “wonder” about where Westworld is headed.
Though Handlen agrees that The Man in Black is “an element that doesn’t quite work,” the lack of real plot development only makes him nervous for the episodes to come. He perceives the pilot as a success even though it functions only as extended exposition, more like the first part of a riddle than the first chapter of a full story. I find this logic confusing, as you would never endorse a riddle without knowing its solution—one half is meaningless without the other. Although she is more hesitant to demonstrate outright support of the series, Nussbaum similarly advises that we keep watching.
Primarily, Nussbaum criticizes the show for making use of the same exploitation that it claims to denounce—patriarchal violence against women in entertainment tailored to straight men. This is a valid concern; social satire can be even more problematic than its targets when it takes societal flaws to extremes without delivering the message that they are, in fact, flaws. Nussbaum worries that Westworld rides dangerously close to this type of ambiguity. She asks, “Is Westworld the blinkered macho fantasy, or is that ‘Westworld’?” This is the kind of scalpel-sharp critique that is too often lacking in television criticism; looking past the face value of a show to dissect it under the light of a larger political framework.
But the way that Nussbaum follows her query reveals why serious critique of the medium can be so challenging: “It’s a meta-cliffhanger with its own allure,” she writes, “leaving us only one way to find out: stay tuned for next week’s episode.” Handlen makes a similar statement in his review, sharing that he is uncertain whether or not the story will be sustainable, but is “eager to find out.”
This is the paradox of television critique; a critic’s job is to swallow works of art whole, to digest them completely in oder to judge them fairly, but television is rarely complete. When a show has a strong following and commercial success, it can afford to close its narrative arcs and tell a whole story. But many series, like Lost, and probably Westworld, intentionally leave plot-lines soaring and mysteries unsolved so as to keep audiences hooked. How is a critic to judge a work that might be nothing but bait, that will only take off its mask after years of seasons have come and gone? Nussbaum and Handlen are somewhat critical of Westworld, but they hold their tongues in light of the fact that the series is only getting started, that their worries could be assuaged by future episodes. However, this position is insufficient, because future episodes will only exist if the audience responds positively to early episodes. In this way, television critics have their hands tied; they cannot fairly judge a show until it is finished, but still must play a role in whether or not that completion ever occurs. Netflix’s all-in-one season release model would help critics navigate this issue, but HBO has maintained its commitment to the classic episode-per-week trickle.
Moreover, the problem is only complicated by the fact that directors and writers are often shuffled between episodes and seasons—Westworld, for example, has had a unique creative team for each installment. Where does a singular work of television end and the next one begin? Handlen has written reviews of each Westworld episode one by one, becoming increasingly critical as HBO reveals more of its hand. “Spending hours showing us a curtain might hold our attention,” he writes in his review of episode five, “but sooner or later, you have to pull the curtain back.” Of course, penning piecemeal reviews like this limits a critic’s ability to judge the whole picture at once. On the other hand, Nussbaum’s review covers the first four episodes, an arbitrary number that is still too few to judge Westworld’s complete narrative, yet simultaneously too many to treat the episodes like individual works.
It is tempting to submit the movie Ex Machina as the converse of Westworld (the film about artificial intelligence is subtle where Westworld is exploitative and narratively-taut where the show is tangled). It is equally tempting to entirely dismiss the show because of the painful performances from two of its actors, Simon Quarterman and Sidse Babett Knudsen, who play important Westworld executives (while he overacts enough to make Anthony Hopkins seem like a robot, she comes off colder than the robots due to her monotonic attempt at an American accent). But to make such warranted criticisms would be unfair to an artwork that is still unfinished. There is only one way to find out the truth about Westworld, and that is to pay for an expensive premium network subscription and watch one episode each week until most fans lose interest and the series is canceled. Only then will it be finished and we can criticize fairly in retrospect. But do not be discouraged! We are lucky to be living in the Golden Age of television.
14,027 Comments
Nice post! This is a very nice blog that I will definitively come back to more times this year! Thanks for informative post. composite gates Doncaster
I am thankful to you for sharing this plethora of useful information. I found this resource utmost beneficial for me. Thanks a lot for hard work. NYC movers
Prefer web-sites are necessary just because supply a sizeable number something related to efficient particulars… jili coin
Nice post! This is a very nice blog that I will definitively come back to more times this year! Thanks for informative post. Company registration process in jaipur
I love reading through and I think this website got some truly utilitarian stuff on it! . situs slot gacor terpercaya hari ini
Glad to be one of several visitants on this awful website : D. https://vipasbola.com/
tambang88
surga777
Thanks for your insight for your fantastic posting. I’m exhilarated I have taken the time to see this. It is not enough; I will visit your site every day. maxwin
솔직히 말해서 스타일로 글을 쓰고 좋은 칭찬을받는 것은 꽤 어렵지만, 너무 차분하고 시원한 느낌으로 해냈고 당신은 일을 잘했습니다. 이 기사는 스타일이 돋보이며 좋은 칭찬을하고 있습니다. 베스트! 토토 사이트
I have been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles or blog posts in this sort of house . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled upon this website. Reading this info So i am satisfied to show that I’ve a very just right uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I such a lot for sure will make sure to don’t disregard this site and provides it a look on a constant. indobet365 Platform Kejuaraan Euro 2024
Well, this Tuesday I read through a couple of your posts and this is probably one of your better ones. Have a nice day! https://panglima4d.site/
You can certainly see your enthusiasm within the work you write. The arena hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to mention how they believe. Always go after your heart. indobet365 Platform Kejuaraan Euro 2024
Possessing read this I thought it had been quite beneficial. I value you taking time and work to put this article together. I when once again locate myself paying method to significantly time both reading and commenting. But so what, it was nonetheless worth it! indobet365 Platform Kejuaraan Euro 2024
Thanks for sharing your ideas in this article. The other point is that each time a problem takes place with a laptop motherboard, people should not take the risk involving repairing the item themselves for if it is not done properly it can lead to permanent damage to the full laptop. It will always be safe just to approach a dealer of a laptop for your repair of motherboard. They’ve got technicians who’ve an skills in dealing with mobile computer motherboard problems and can make the right diagnosis and undertake repairs. indobet365 Platform Kejuaraan Euro 2024
I discovered your blog post site on the search engines and check a few of your early posts. Always keep in the top notch operate. I extra your Feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking for forward to reading much more of your stuff down the road!… bo togel terpercaya
Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read anything in this way before. So nice to discover somebody with a few original thoughts on this subject. realy appreciation for beginning this up. this web site is something that is required over the internet, a person with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the web! Judi online sbobet Resmi
I’d constantly want to be update on new blog posts on this internet site , saved to favorites ! . Judi online sbobet Resmi
One other important aspect is that if you are an elderly person, travel insurance regarding pensioners is something you ought to really take into consideration. The old you are, greater at risk you are for making something terrible happen to you while overseas. If you are not covered by quite a few comprehensive insurance coverage, you could have some serious problems. Thanks for sharing your guidelines on this blog site. agen judi bola sbobet88
I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in your new posts. Thanks for sharing. agen judi bola sbobet88
Welcome to Stylesium, the cutting-edge fashion blog where creativity meets style. Are you a passionate fashion writer or an aspiring blogger?
fashion write for us
Wow! This could be one particular of the most beneficial blogs We’ve ever arrive across on this subject. Actually Wonderful. I’m also an expert in this topic so I can understand your effort. agen judi bola sbobet88
SLOT ONLINE GACOR
코인지갑개발블록체인프로젝트의모든것코인라인 입니다.코인,지갑개발,거래소개발,마케팅,백서,웹사이트.
https://coinline.co.kr/
Thank you for taking the time to publish this information very useful! 토토사이트
그것은 완전히 흥미로운 블로그 게시입니다. 저는 종종 Diwali Bumper Lottery에 대한 내 프로젝트의 도움을 위해 귀하의 게시물을 방문하고 귀하의 슈퍼 쓰기 기능은 진정으로 나를 깜짝 놀라게했습니다. 카지노 사이트
i really like this article please keep it up. sigaribet
Your blog has the same post as another author but i like your better.~’~:’ Tiranga Games
I’m glad I found this web site, I couldn’t find any knowledge on this matter prior to.Also operate a site and if you are ever interested in doing some visitor writing for me if possible feel free to let me know, im always look for people to check out my web site. idngg login
솔직히 말해서 스타일로 글을 쓰고 좋은 칭찬을받는 것은 꽤 어렵지만, 너무 차분하고 시원한 느낌으로 해냈고 당신은 일을 잘했습니다. 이 기사는 스타일이 돋보이며 좋은 칭찬을하고 있습니다. 베스트! 온라인 카지노
Thank you very much for this useful article. I like it. idngg login
Thanks for your insight for your fantastic posting. I’m exhilarated I have taken the time to see this. It is not enough; I will visit your site every day. vip
솔직히 말해서 스타일로 글을 쓰고 좋은 칭찬을받는 것은 꽤 어렵지만, 너무 차분하고 시원한 느낌으로 해냈고 당신은 일을 잘했습니다. 이 기사는 스타일이 돋보이며 좋은 칭찬을하고 있습니다. 베스트! 먹튀슈퍼맨
I’m curious to find out what blog system you are utilizing? I’m experiencing some small security issues with my latest website and I would like to find something more risk-free. Do you have any suggestions? pressure washing addlestone
Seseorang sesekali mengunjungi blog Anda secara konsisten dan meresepkannya, saya akan mengatakan untuk membaca dengan teliti juga. Pendekatan dalam mengarang sangat fenomenal dan terlebih lagi substansinya adalah yang terbaik. Terima kasih atas pengertian yang Anda berikan kepada para pembaca slot pg
Interesting post. I Have Been wondering about this issue. so thanks for posting. Pretty cool post.It ‘s really very nice and Useful post.Thanks Slot online
There are some interesting points over time in this posting but I don’t determine if I see these people center to heart. There is certainly some validity but I will take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good post , thanks and that we want a lot more! Put into FeedBurner also Packers and Movers Hyderabad to Dindigul
I simply must tell you that you have written an excellent and unique article that I really enjoyed reading. I’m fascinated by how well you laid out your material and presented your views. Thank you. Fmovie
훌륭한 게시물과 리뷰에 감사드립니다. 이런 일을 계속하십시오. 사설토토
“Thank you for sharing such valuable information. I always look forward to reading your posts!” francobolli rari
Discover the power of the 1xbet promo code “1XBOX777” and claim your share of bonuses today. Sign up now and enjoy a rewarding betting experience like never before. 1xbet promo code nigeria
다소 환상적이지만이 치료법의 조언을 확인하십시오. 슈퍼맨티비
글을 많이 읽었고 정확히 말하고 싶은 것을 정리하는 글쓰기 방식이 매우 좋다는 것을 알게되어 감명을 받았으며 앞으로 다시오고 싶습니다 .. 메이저사이트
The appearance positively wonderful. All of these miniature info are fashioned utilizing massive amount historical past experience. I want it all significantly musik4d
The standard approach to explaining SLOTXO project assumptions is to start with the background details and end with a possible solution.
Affordable And Cheap Tyres Dubai dubai tyres : Quality and Reliability at Low Prices
그것을 읽고 사랑하고, 더 많은 새로운 업데이트를 기다리고 있으며 이미 최근 게시물을 읽었습니다. 온라인 카지노
Affordable And Cheap Tyres Dubai: Quality and Reliability at Low Prices
bedroom furnitures should be sized up and paired with the color and type of your beddings., situs togel terbesar
It is the kind of information I have been trying to find. Thank you for writing this information. It has proved utmost beneficial for me. akun pro