Tag Archives: ridesharing

Recent research

Allocation problem for the platform of platforms

1 Comment

Another joint work with Ruijie Li, built on our previous research of ridesharing, including A-PASS and Pricing carpool.

In this study, we consider a general problem called the Allocation Problem for the Platform of Platforms – dubbed AP3.  Such a problem might arise  in a two-sided service market, where a third-party integrator tries to allocate customers to workers separately controlled by a set of online platforms in a manner that satisfies all stakeholders.   The integrator, as a leader, influences the outcome of the game by pricing the service, whereas the platforms (followers) are given the freedom to accept or reject customers to maximize their own profit, given the prices set by the integrator (see the plot below for an illustration).  A set of nonlinear constraints are imposed on the leader’s problem to eliminate artificial scarcity, orignated from the integrator’s monopoly power.  We formulate AP3 as a Stackelberg bipartite matching problem, which is known to be NP-hard in general.  Our main result concerns the proof that AP3 can be reduced to a polynomially solvable problem by taking advantage of, somewhat paradoxically, the hard requirement of ruling out artificial scarcity.

A preprint can be downloaded here.

Abstract: We study the Allocation Problem for the Platform of Platforms (abbreviated as AP3) in a two-sided service market, where a third-party integrator tries to allocate customers to workers separately controlled by a set of online platforms in a manner that satisfies all stakeholders. AP3 is a natural Stackelberg game. The integrator, as a leader, influences the outcome of the game by pricing the service, whereas the platforms (followers) are given the freedom to accept or reject customers to maximize their own profit, given the prices set by the integrator. A set of nonlinear constraints are imposed on the leader’s problem to eliminate artificial scarcity, derived from the integrator’s monopoly power. We formulate AP3 as a Stackelberg bipartite matching problem, which is known to be NP-hard in general. Our main result concerns the proof that AP3 can be reduced to a polynomially solvable problem by taking advantage of, somewhat paradoxically, the “hard” requirement of ruling out artificial scarcity. Numerical experiments are conducted using the ride-hail service market as a case study. We find artificial scarcity negatively affects the number of customers served, although the magnitude of the effect varies with market conditions. In most cases, the integrator takes the lion’s share of the profit, but the need to eliminate artificial scarcity sometimes forces them to concede the benefits of collaboration to the platforms. The tighter the supply relative to the demand, the more the platforms benefit from removing artificial scarcity. In an over-supplied market, however, the integrator has a consistent and overwhelming advantage bestowed by its monopoly position.

Recent research

Pricing carpool rides

Leave a comment

The initial idea of the paper was proposed by Ruijie Li, then a visiting student from Southwest Jiaotong University. He read about the mechanism design issues in ride-sharing, and was convinced that more research is needed in this direction.  In this paper we focus on a feature that many ridesharing users care about: the schedule displacement (i.e., the difference between the desired and actual arrival time) in matching.   By assuming the users bid for shared rides by reporting their valuation of the displacement, we are able to analyze the matching and pricing problem using the auction theory, including the well-known VCG scheme.    The paper was published in Transportation Science in 2020.    A preprint may be downloaded here.

Abstract: This paper considers a carpool matching (CaMa) problem in which participants price shared rides based on both operating cost and schedule displacement (i.e, the absolute difference between the desired and actual arrival times). By reporting their valuation of this displacement, each participant in effect bids for every possible shared ride that generates a unique value to her. The CaMa problem can be formulated as a mixed integer program (MIP) that maximizes the social welfare by choosing matching pairs and a departure time for each pair. We show the optimal departure time can be determined for each pair a prior, independent of the matching problem. This result reduces the CaMa problem to a standard bipartite matching problem. We prove that the classical Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) pricing policy ensures no participant is worse off or has the incentive to misreport their valuation of schedule displacement. To control the large deficit created by the VCG policy, we develop a single-side reward (SSR) pricing policy, which only compensates participants who are forced by the system to endure a schedule displacement. Under the assumption of overpricing tendency (i.e., no participant would want to underreport their value), we show the SSR policy not only generates substantial profits, but also retains the other desired properties of the VCG policy, notably truthful reporting. Even though it cannot rule out underreporting, our simulation experiments confirm that the SSR policy is a robust and deficit-free alternative to the VCG policy. Specifically, we find that (1) underreporting is not a practical concern for a carpool platform as it never reduces the number of matched pairs and its impact on profits is largely negligible; and (2) participants have very little to gain by underreporting their value.

Recent research

To pool or not to pool

Leave a comment
To Pool or Not to Pool: Equilibrium,  Pricing and Regulation

This paper was the first published based on  Kenan’s PhD research. It introduces ride-pooling into the equilibrium analysis of the ride-hail market and analyzes the effect of pricing strategies and various regulations on pooling.

After the first draft is completed in the Spring of 2019,  it took almost two years  to move the paper through various stages of the review process, first at Management Science, then at Transportation Research Part B (three rounds). While the long waiting was no doubt frustrating, the quality of the paper might have benefited from intensive scrutiny and repeated revisions.  For a preprint, please check here; the link to the final version is here.

Abstract: We study a monopoly transportation network company (TNC) in an aggregate market that offers on-demand solo and pooling e-hail services, while competing with transit for passengers. The market equilibrium is established based on a spatial driver-passenger matching model that characterizes the passenger wait time for both solo and pooling rides. We prove, under mild conditions, this system always has an equilibrium solution. Built on the market equilibrium, three variants of pricing problems are analyzed and compared, namely, (i) profit maximization, (ii) profit maximization subject to regulatory constraints, and (iii) social welfare maximization subject to a revenue-neutral constraint. A comprehensive case study is constructed using TNC data collected in the city of Chicago. We found pooling is desirable when demand is high, but supply is scarce. However, its benefit diminishes quickly as the average en-route detour time (i.e., the difference between the average duration of solo and pooling trips) increases. Without regulations, a mixed strategy—providing both solo and pooling rides—not only achieves the highest profit and trip production in most scenarios, but also gains higher social welfare. The minimum wage policy can improve social welfare in the short term. However, in the long run, the TNC could react by limiting the size of the driver pool, and consequently, render the policy counterproductive, even pushing social welfare below the unregulated level. Moreover, by maintaining the supply and demand of ride-hail at an artificially high level, the minimum wage policy tends to exacerbate traffic congestion by depressing the use of collective modes (transit and pooling). A congestion tax policy that penalizes solo rides promotes pooling, but consistently harms social welfare. However, it promises to increase both social welfare and pooling ratio, when jointly implemented with the minimum wage policy.

Recent research

A-PASS for Travel Demand Management

Leave a comment
Auction-Based Permit Allocation and Sharing System (A-Pass) for Travel Demand Management, co-authored by Ruijie Li and Xiaobo Liu (both at Southwest Jiaotong University, China).

This is a follow up to another paper related to the mechanism design problems arising from ridesharing.  In this paper, we try to show the promise of integrating ridesharing with quantity-based travel demand management.  One of the main insights is that by auctioning out permits (e.g., to use a road facility), we can eliminate the deficits that are otherwise unavoidable in classical  Vickrey-Clark-Gloves mechanism.  The paper just came out in Transportation Science. You may read the abstract below and download a preprint here.

We propose a novel quantity-based demand management system aiming to promote ride-sharing. The system sells the permit to access a facility (conceptualized as a bottleneck) by auction but encourages commuters to share the permits with each other. The permit is classified according to access time and the commuters may be assigned one of the three roles: solo driver, ride-sharing driver, or rider. At the core of this auction-based permit allocation and sharing system (A-PASS) is a trilateral matching problem (TMP) that matches permits, drivers and riders. We formulate TMP as an integer program, and prove it can be reduced to an equivalent linear program. A pricing policy based on the classical Vickrey-Clark-Gloves (VCG) mechanism is proposed to determine the payment for each commuter. We prove, under the VCG policy, different commuters will pay exactly the same price as long as their role and access time are the same. We also show A-PASS can eliminate any deficit that may arise from the VCG policy by controlling the number of shared rides. Results of numerical experiment suggest A-PASS strongly promote rider-sharing. As ride-sharing increases, all stake holders are better off: the ride-sharing platform receives greater profits, the commuters enjoy higher utility, and the society benefits from more efficient utilization of infrastructure.